top of page

DCFAS/CPS: Child Trafficking Policy

  • UPE
  • Feb 6, 2025
  • 1 min read
On February 5, 2025, your UPE team met with the County regarding the updated Child Trafficking policy.
Prior to the meeting, your UPE team requested information from the department regarding Commercially Sexually Exploited Children (CSEC) Social Workers (SW), such as the number of CSEC SWs, the weighting of cases/referrals, and the data grid. We wanted to make sure that should a non-CSEC SW receive a CSEC referral/case, it would be weighted the same as a CSEC SW. The department said this would be the case.  

Per the new policy, there will now be investigative questions to be asked of the reporter and/or the youth by the SW. UPE requested to be able to review these questions prior to the publishing of the policy. The department had no issue with this, and a link to these investigative questions will be provided within the policy.

In the new policy, under the documentation portion for all programs, an ongoing task for the SW is “…case management responsibilities related to labor trafficking.” UPE asked if the SWs know what these responsibilities are, to which the department responded that they will be outlined in the linked policy, “How to Document a Commercially Sexually Exploited Children (CSEC) and/or Labor Trafficking Allegation in CWS/CMS.” This policy is also lined in the Child Trafficking policy.

Other changes that your UPE team requested were minor language changes surrounding engaging with the youth and the ending of sexual exploitation.
 
UPE thanks our advocates, Eric Booker, Janine Garrett, and Sarah Singleton.

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG!

Recent Posts

See All
DHA - ABAWD Meeting #3

Greetings UPE sisters and brothers, Your UPE 008 team met again with DHA management on 5/1/26 regarding ABAWD/HR1 changes to the CF program. Department management agreed to several of UPE’s proposals

 
 
New Countywide Policies

On April 17, 2026, UPE 005 representatives met with Sacramento County over four new proposed County-wide policies: Incompatible Activities, Nepotism, Pre-Employment Checks, and a County Code of Conduc

 
 
DHA - ABAWD Meeting 2

Greetings Union Brothers, Sisters, and Friends, Your 008 bargaining team met for the second time with the department regarding the re-implementation of ABAWD requirements for CalFresh,

 
 
bottom of page